Blog

Should You Have an SMSF? An Adelaide Accountant’s Honest Guide

Search the blog

Select a Category

Categories

Recent Posts

Subscribe to our mailing list

Happy retired couple enjoying the results of good superannuation planning

Should You Have an SMSF? An Adelaide Accountant’s Honest Guide

PUBLISHED ON

Aug 8, 2026

6 MINUTES READ

Somebody at a barbecue has told you about their self-managed super fund, and now you’re wondering whether you should have one too. It’s one of the questions we’re asked most often as SMSF accountants in Adelaide — and our honest answer is that an SMSF is brilliant for some people and a genuinely bad idea for others. Before you set one up, here’s what the barbecue conversation leaves out.

What an SMSF actually asks of you

An SMSF isn’t a product you buy; it’s a trust you run. Becoming a trustee means the legal responsibility for the fund sits with you personally — not with your accountant, not with your adviser, and not with the fund itself. That includes maintaining a documented investment strategy, keeping the fund’s assets strictly separate from your own, meeting the sole purpose test (the fund exists to provide for your retirement, not to benefit you along the way), and getting the fund independently audited every single year. The Commissioner’s penalty regime applies to trustees personally. None of this is difficult with the right support around you — but “self-managed” is a genuinely accurate name, and anyone who breezes past the responsibilities is not giving you advice, they’re making a sale.

When an SMSF makes sense

The strongest cases we see share a theme: control with a purpose. You want to hold an asset your industry fund simply can’t — most commonly direct property, including business premises for practice and business owners. You have a family group who benefit from pooling super into one fund (an SMSF can now have up to six members). You want direct control of investment decisions, estate planning outcomes, or the timing and structure of your pension phase. In those situations an SMSF isn’t a lifestyle accessory; it’s the only structure that does the job.

When it doesn’t

An SMSF rarely makes sense when the honest motivation is vague dissatisfaction with your current fund, a friend’s enthusiasm, or the feeling that “managing it myself” must be cheaper. The costs of running an SMSF are largely fixed — administration, the annual audit, lodgement — so whether they’re good value depends heavily on your balance and what you’re actually doing with the control. And if your investment plan is “the same diversified portfolio my industry fund already holds, but with more paperwork,” the SMSF is adding cost and obligation without adding anything else. We have talked a number of people out of SMSFs over the years. We consider that part of the job.

The compliance calendar never stops

Every year, without exception: financial statements, member statements, an independent audit, an annual return, and a check that the investment strategy still matches what the fund actually holds. Miss the rhythm and problems compound quietly — an outdated strategy here, a late lodgement there — until audit time turns stressful. This is the unglamorous machinery our SMSF administration service exists to run, so trustees can spend their attention on the investment decisions, which is the part they wanted the fund for in the first place.

Property in an SMSF: powerful, and unforgiving

Holding property in super is the reason many Adelaide business owners and investors set up an SMSF at all — and done properly, it can be a superb strategy, particularly for premises your own business leases from the fund. But the rules around related-party transactions, borrowing through a limited recourse arrangement, and how the property is used are strict and unforgiving of improvisation. This is the single area where we most often see funds set up without advice get into trouble. If property is your motivation, get the structure designed before you sign anything — our property investment and SMSF teams work on these together.

So… should you?

The honest test is three questions. Do you want to do something with your super that your current fund can’t do? Is your balance and situation such that the fixed costs are proportionate? And are you prepared to be a trustee — with support, but with the responsibility sitting on your shoulders? Three yeses and an SMSF is worth a serious conversation. Anything less, and the most valuable advice may be to leave things exactly where they are.

Nitschke Nancarrow has administered self-managed super funds for Adelaide families, professionals and business owners for over twenty years, from fund establishment through annual compliance, audit coordination and pension phase. If you’re weighing it up, get in touch or call 1300 059 670 — and expect a straight answer either way.

This article is general information only and doesn’t consider your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Get advice specific to your situation before making decisions about superannuation.

Share this post

Tags

Kym Nitschke

Kym Nitschke is the Managing Partner of Nitschke Nancarrow, an Adelaide accounting and financial advice firm he has led for over two decades. A Fellow Chartered Accountant with degrees in Commerce (Accounting) and Economics, Kym is also a licensed financial planner, mortgage broker, property developer and licensed builder — and has specialised in the financial affairs of doctors and medical professionals for more than 20 years. He hosts the Accounting Insider podcast.